![]() |
|
| Home | About Us | Children's Advocate | Defensor de los Niños | Resources Get Involved | Children's Advocates Roundtable | How to Help | Search |
|
![]() |
En español: “Responsabilidad de abajo hacia arriba” |
This article originally appeared in the November-December 2005 issue of the Children's Advocate, published by Action Alliance for Children. “Bottom-up accountability”Parents can use the No Child Left Behind Act to get more of a voice in their kids’ schoolsBy Deborah KongMary Johnson and other parents were tired of being treated as “rubber stampers.” Rather than working with parents as partners, teachers and administrators in Lynwood “would develop a plan and just bring it to the School Site Council meeting for parents to sign,” says Johnson, president of Parent-U-Turn, a parent advocacy group. “Parents were not being respected for the knowledge that we have about what is good for our kids.” So she and other members of Parent-U-Turn decided “we’re going to change the structure,” recalls Johnson, the mother of three sons and a daughter who have now graduated from Lynwood Unified School District. “We’re going to make it friendly for the parent. We’re also going to make it so parents sit at the table.” District officials did not return calls seeking comment. Rights—and resultsTo back up their demands for change, Parent-U-Turn used the parental involvement requirements of the federal No Child Left Behind law. Even then, it was hard work, Johnson says. But last November, the district signed an agreement creating new systems of parent involvement. For example, parents now sit on panels that interview applicants for teaching jobs. The district trains parents on understanding test scores and other school data. And schools must hold elections for parents who sit on decision-making panels. Now, says Johnson, “parents are sitting on the textbook committee. They are sitting in on interviews. Parents are feeling welcome at the school.” It’s the lawIf a school receives Title One federal funds to boost achievement in low-income areas, the No Child Left Behind Act requires the school and the district to involve parents in developing both parent involvement policies and school improvement plans (see NCLB: Parent rights). Research provides overwhelming evidence that parent involvement promotes children’s academic achievement. “Under No Child Left Behind, (parents) have the right to be equal partners,” Johnson says. “We needed bottom-up accountability to make the schools treat parents in a respectful way. Now we had something in writing that we could demand.” Key to success: UnityGetting the school district to meet those demands wasn’t easy, Johnson says. Ten to 25 members of Parent-U-Turn participated in meetings with the district superintendent, a local newspaper reporter, and their state Assembly member. They also called and faxed the California Department of Education. In the end, says Johnson, the district agreed to a legally binding contract with 14 parental involvement requirements. John Rogers, associate director of UCLA’s Institute for Democracy, Education, & Access, says, “real change occurs when parents come together.” Rogers, a faculty member at UCLA’s School of Education, says the institute worked with Parent-U-Turn to produce data about school conditions, and Parent-U-Turn members participated in the institute’s workshops. “Groups like Parent-U-Turn have been so vigilant that the district hasn’t been able to just drive the entire agenda,” Rogers notes. Opened a doorLynnwood parent Valerie Muñoz says she’s happy with the changes she’s seen. At the high school where she works as a community aide, meetings are now posted in advance, and the principal attends every parent meeting, she says. No Child Left Behind “opened a new door where we can be part of the decision-making,” Muñoz says. She urges parents to “exercise your rights. It’s your school! If you don’t fight for your child, nobody’s going to do it for you.”
NCLB Resources
NCLB: Tips for parentsExperts and parents who have used No Child Left Behind offer this advice:
Sources: Mary Johnson, president, Parent-U-Turn; William Taylor, chair, Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights; Public Education Network; Judy Goddess, education consultant
NCLB: Parent rightsIf schools receive money from Title One they must:
Source: California Department of Education, www.cde.ca.gov/sp/sw/t1/parentalbroch.asp
Extra resources from the Children’s Advocate bulletin
To stay informed about new and upcoming Children’s Advocate articles, related resources, and advocacy opportunities, sign up for our Children’s Advocate bulletin
|
| “Bottom-up accountability” |
||
| NCLB Resources | ||
| NCLB: Tips for parents | ||
| NCLB: Parent rights | ||
| Extra resources from the Children’s Advocate bulletin |
||
|
|
||
| Download pdf version | ||
| About the Children's Advocate |
||
| Add your voice! | ||
| Subscribe | ||
| Current issue | ||
|
|
||
| Articles by subject: | ||
| Advocacy and Community Building |
||
| Books | ||
| Child Care and Early Childhood Education |
||
| Child Development | ||
| Child Welfare | ||
| En español | ||
| Health | ||
| Parents and Parent Leadership |
||
| Schools and School-Age Children |
||
| Violence Prevention | ||
| Welfare, Family Income, and Poverty |
||
|
Action Alliance |
||