Children's Advocate
Home | About Us | Children's Advocate | Defensor de los Niños | Resources
Get Involved | Children's Advocates Roundtable | How to Help | Search
colorbar
En español:
Elecciones 2006: Proposiciones: Otras

This article originally appeared in the September - October 2006 issue of the Children's Advocate, published by Action Alliance for Children.

Use the Children's Advocate in your work! Feel free to reprint this article, as a handout or in your own publication -- just credit us (see above) and be sure to send us a copy.

Election 2006

Ballot Measures: Other

Proposition 89: Public financing for state elections

by Jessine Foss

This measure would provide public funds for candidates running for state office, beginning January 2007. It would also limit campaign contributions by corporations and unions. The measure would be funded by a 0.2% tax increase on corporations.

Candidates would

  • need $5 contributions from enough voters to be eligible
  • agree not to accept money from most private sources
  • receive a fixed amount of money for their race
  • get additional money, if needed, to match opponents’ spending.

Supporters say

“Children are the last consideration in Sacramento,” says Charles Idelson of the California Nurses Association, because of lobbying by special interests. Prop. 89 would

  • Limit the power of corporations because they would no longer be able to spend millions to end health and welfare protections.
  • Improve how politicians do their jobs because they wouldn’t have to fundraise in office.
  • Improve the election system. In states with public funds for elections, more women and people of color run for office, voter turnout increases, and campaign costs decrease.

Supporters: Yes on 89 (800-440-6877; http://www.cleanmoneyelections.org/ -- link removed), California Nurses Association, California League of Women Voters, Consumer Federation of California

Opponents say Prop. 89 would

  • Reduce the voice of teachers by “severely limiting the ability of unions to fight for our students,” says Mike Myslinski of the California Teachers Association.
  • Lead to “bad” laws, says the California Chamber of Commerce, such as SB 2 (which would have required employers to provide health coverage).
  • Not address real problems such as fraud, health care, schools, and transportation.
  • Not limit spending by wealthy candidates on their own campaigns.

Opponents: No on 89 (916-448-4234), California Chamber of Commerce, California Small Business Roundtable, California Taxpayers’ Association, California Teachers Association, National Tax-Limitation Committee

 

Return to top



Proposition 1C: Housing and Emergency Shelter

by Aimee Strain

The legislature put this measure on the ballot. It would borrow $2.9 billion by issuing bonds to provide support for homebuyers ($500 million) and housing for seniors, low-income families, and emancipated foster youth ($395 million); people with disabilities ($195 million); and farm workers ($135 million). It would also fund shelters and transitional housing for battered women and people at risk of homelessness ($195 million), and parks and transportation for new housing.

Supporters say Prop. 1C would be

  • Good for kids: It would provide stable homes for children, says Julie Spezia of Homes 4 California. California’s affordable housing crisis is threatening children’s well-being with overcrowding, unsafe housing, and homelessness.
  • Good for the economy: It would create 87,000 full-time jobs, $3.5 billion in wages in the housing industry, and millions in tax revenue.
  • Good for the environment: It would prioritize building on under-utilized land and pay for cleaning up polluted sites.
  • Good for women and kids leaving abusive relationships: Over 5,000 women and children were turned away last year from full battered-women’s shelters. (Children who witness domestic violence often have emotional or behavioral problems.)

Supporters: Homes 4 California (916-447-0503, http://www.housingca.org/), AARP, California Chamber of Commerce, California Partnership to End Domestic Violence, California Teachers Association, Housing California

Opponents say Prop. 1C would

  • Badly use bond funds: “It is improper to use general obligation bonds to create a home for an individual” instead of paying for public services such as roads and dams, says Lew Uhler of the National Tax-Limitation Committee.
  • Increase California’s debt by borrowing more money through bonds.

Opponents: National Tax-Limitation Committee (916-786-9400), Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, Assemblymember Chuck Vore

 

Return to top

 



Extra resources from the Children’s Advocate bulletin (updated 9-06)

 

Election 2006 nonpartisan resources

  • California Easy Voter Guide offers an easy-to-read election guide with summaries of ballot measures and information on how elections work. Online with other resources, including a sample voter education workshop, at http://www.easyvoter.org/
  • Election-Year Lobbying for Nonprofits, from the California Association of Nonprofits, offers guidelines for nonprofits on compiling voting guides, conducting advocacy efforts, and registering voters. Online at http://www.canonprofits.org/
  • Health Vote, from the California Health Care Foundation, will provide information after Sept 6 on statewide ballot measures related to health, including pro and con arguments, facts and analysis, and information on financial contributors. Online at http://www.healthvote.org
  • Smart Voter, from the California League of Women Voters, offers summaries of ballot measures with pro and con arguments. Online at http://www.smartvoter.org

Voter participation resources

  • "Why Should I Vote?", from the Children's Advocate, is a reproducable, bilingual cartoon flyer about why parents and others should vote.
    Online in English and Spanish at http://www.4children.org/pdf/904flyer.pdf

 

To stay informed about new and upcoming Children’s Advocate articles, related resources, and advocacy opportunities, sign up for our Children’s Advocate bulletin

 

Return to top

 

 

 
Proposition 89:
Public financing
for state elections
Proposition 1C:
Housing and
Emergency Shelter
Extra resources from
the Children’s
Advocate
bulletin
(updated 9-06)
 

 
Download pdf version
About the Children's
Advocate
Add your voice!
Subscribe
Current issue

 
Articles by subject:
Advocacy and Community
Building
Books
Child Care and Early
Childhood Education
Child Development
Child Welfare
En español
Health
Parents and Parent
Leadership
Schools and School-Age
Children
Violence Prevention
Welfare, Family Income,
and Poverty




Action Alliance
for Children

e-mail aac@4children.org
1201 Martin Luther
King Jr. Way
Oakland, CA 94612
(510) 444-7136